'Money Monster' Review
Image from We Got This Covered
By Darian Scalamoni
|
When was the last time you saw a George Clooney film that
impressed you? Over the last 3 years the superstar actor has starred in films
like Tomorrowland and The Monuments Men leading to a lull and
lack of success that he hasn’t faced since the failure of Batman & Robin; unfortunately you can add Money Monster to the list of recent disappointments in his
filmography.
Money Monster is a film that sees a gunman
(Jack O’Connell) hold a television studio hostage believing that the host of
the program with the same title as the film is responsible for him losing
millions of dollars. Lee Gates (George Clooney) is one of the most popular
television hosts and personalities in the country. His job is to sway viewers
to make smart investments within the stock market but for a young man named
Kyle Budwell (Jack O’Connell), it’s the fact that he felt betrayed by a piece
of stock that failed with no real explanation from Gates. He is loud and
obnoxious but also has charm and wit. It’s hard to believe that Gates would be
anywhere though, if it wasn’t for his director Patty Fenn (Julia Roberts).
Though the chemistry between Roberts and Clooney is believable, they aren’t
able to save this film to stay afloat as an intense thriller as was shown in
the trailer.
The
movie showcases a situation that would be incredibly intense for everyone
involved yet, the film just falls flat. The film deals with trading stocks and
the stock market in general which is a major controversy within not only Money Monster but also in the real
world. The whole movie acts as a social commentary and is very current with the
questions surrounding trading stocks but unfortunately for this film, The Big
Short was an example of the right way this story could be handled successfully.
This
wouldn’t be a problem though if the film wasn’t so damn predictable. It seems
as if from the beginning, everything is set up perfectly for the viewer to know
the ending before you’re even within the second act. It’s truly a shame that
such a lackluster movie has so much baggage that the performances from Clooney,
Roberts and O’Connell are likely to be overlooked. Jodie Foster (Silence of the Lambs, Panic Room) shows
her best effort with direction here which rings true through her actors
performances’ but it is to no avail.
The
movie ends almost as quickly as it gets underway at a runtime of only 98
minutes and you’ll be disappointed mostly by hostage clichés that don’t work as
well here as they did in a film such as John
Q. The result of this film is an unsurprising format that doesn’t
accomplish what it is ultimately aiming for. There’s no need to see this film
unless it’s for the performances, otherwise you can just take a pass at this
most recent attempt from Jodie Foster.
5/10
Comments
Post a Comment